Inside the most analyses we explored the relationship anywhere between participants’ standard risk/danger sign top as well as their utilization of the program (Desk step 3)

Inside the most analyses we explored the relationship anywhere between participants’ standard risk/danger sign top as well as their utilization of the program (Desk step 3)

The results show that baseline characteristics were only loosely correlated with the number of logins, completed monitoring assessments, page hits, and forum visits, while stronger associations were found with the more intense parts of the intervention (forum posts and chat participations). In addition, age was correlated with utilization between rspearman=.17 (age ? logins) and rspearman=.25 (age ? forum visits; all p < .01). 1.

Most of the correlations away from Bmi which have application was lower than

The correlations off Bmi with usage was below

Every correlations out-of Bmi with utilization were less than

All correlations out of Bmi that have application was in fact lower than

All of the correlations off Body mass index with usage was less than

All of the correlations away from Bmi which have application had been less than

All of the correlations away from Bmi with utilization were below

Most of the correlations away from Body mass index which have use was indeed lower than

All of the correlations away from Bmi that have usage was indeed lower than

All the correlations away from Body mass index that have application were below

All correlations out-of Bmi which have utilization had been less than

Most of the correlations https://datingranking.net/pl/mobifriends-recenzja/ off Body mass index with usage have been less than

All of the correlations out of Bmi which have use have been below

All the correlations out of Bmi which have utilization had been lower than

All the correlations of Bmi which have utilization was indeed lower than

The correlations off Bmi that have application was basically less than

All correlations off Bmi that have usage was indeed below

Total(N = step three,548) School(Letter = 2,739) On the internet hook(N = 255) Recommended of the pal(Letter = 141) Flyer/poster(Letter = 118) Most other (Letter = 295) Attempt analytics p
Notice. Logins = number of logins to help you ProYouth; Monitorings = amount of complete overseeing questionnaires; Forum posts = quantity of efforts into the community forum; Chats = involvement inside on the internet counseling speak concept (group otherwise private); Page strikes = quantity of users utilized in the new member urban area (i. age., just after login); Forum visits = amount of pages utilized throughout the community forum (we. e., immediately following log in); IQR= inter quartile Diversity; * = median decide to try.
Logins* M (Md [IQR]) step three.nine (0 [0–1]) 1.3 (step 1 [0–1]) thirteen.4 (dos [1–5]) 20.cuatro (step 1 [1–3]) 6.2 (step 1 [0–3]) 11.step three (step one [0–4]) ?2(4) = 327.6 <.001
Monitorings* Yards (Md [IQR]) 1.3 (0 [0–1]) 0.eight (0 (0–0]) step three.9 (step one [0–3]) dos.six (0 [0–2]) 2.5 (0 [0–2]) step three.7 (step one [0–3]) ?2(4) = 308.six <.001
Forum listings % step three.3 step 1.cuatro eleven.cuatro 9.9 5.step 1 10.dos ?2(4) = 150.dos <.001
Chats % step 3.0 step 1.1 10.dos eleven.cuatro 8.5 7.8 ?2(4) = 150.eight <.001
Webpage moves* M (Md [IQR]) 34.step one (4 [0–15]) 12.8 (2 [0–11]) 129.seven (19 [2–53]) 116.0 (thirteen [3–34]) 63.4 (11 [0–28]) 98.8 (15 [0–39]) ?2(4) = 223.six <.001
Community forum visits* Meters (Md [IQR]) 5.5 (0 [0–0]) step 1.step 1 (0 [0–0]) 21.2 (1 [0–7]) 27.4 (0 [0–3]) 8.9 (0 [0–2]) 21.0 (0 [0–3]) ?2(4) = 585.2 <.001
Sex WCS > 57 Bingeing Laxatives Nausea Low-energy restaurants Do so Bingeing and you may nausea Earlier colorado
Note. Logins = number of logins to ProYouth; Monitorings = number of completed monitoring questionnaires; Message board posts = number of contributions to the forum; Chats = participation in online counseling chat session (group or individual); Page hits = number of pages accessed in the participant area (i. e., after login); Message board visits = number of pages accessed in the forum (i. e., after login); WCS = Weight Concerns Scale; tx = treatment; OR = odds ratio; rspearman = Spearman rank correlations; CI = confidence interval; **p <. 01.
Logins rspearman .18** .21** .13** .04** .14** .15** .00 .14** .14**
Monitorings rspearman .23** .22** .13** .07** .14** .17** .02 .17** .14**
Page hits rspearman .17** .21** .14** .05** .14** .14** .00 .14** .15**
Forum visits rspearman .18** .25** .17** .13** .20** .19** .01 .20** .23**
Forum posts Or [CI] cuatro.3 [2.3–8.1] 5.step 3 [step three.6–eight.9] 2.seven [step one.9–cuatro.0] step three.eight [dos.2–6.1] 4.step three [dos.9–six.4] 3.8 [2.5–5.7] step 1.2 [0.8–step 1.7] Otherwise = 3.8 [2.5–5.8] Otherwise = 5.step 3 [step three.5–8.0]
Chats Or [CI] 47.7 [six.6–341] ten.six [6.5–17.1] step 3.8 [2.5–5.7] 2.6 [1.5–cuatro.7] 5.4 [step three.6–8.2] 7.5 [cuatro.6–12.4] step one.4 [step 1.0–dos.1] Otherwise = 4.six [step three.0–7.1] Or = dos.9 [step 1.8–4.7]
No Comments

Post A Comment